This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
en:faq [2022/07/12 15:47] david [How are sales in Minuto taxed?] |
en:faq [2022/07/12 18:04] david [Are the guarantors generally obligated to redeem the Minutos?] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
No. Guaranteeing a voucher means having to provide an equivalent service if the issuer and his legal successors (heirs) are unable to provide a service, for example in the event of: Inability to work or earn, " | No. Guaranteeing a voucher means having to provide an equivalent service if the issuer and his legal successors (heirs) are unable to provide a service, for example in the event of: Inability to work or earn, " | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== CRITIQUE ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== What about elderly or disabled people who can't perform or issue Minutos? ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | When new ideas are introduced, people often unconsciously want a general solution to all our social problems. Minuto is basically just a means of payment with almost ideal properties that ensures that goods and services can be exchanged fairly and efficiently. How people in need of help are dealt with is basically a different topic. | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, one thing can already be said, since very many of our social problems result from the monopoly position of the current money, in a world with many different means of payment, e.g. like Minuto, many of our problems would not occur at all or they would be less pronounced. Thus, it would be much easier to help people in need, because we would live in more prosperity and would have much more time to help others. | ||
+ | |||
\\ | \\ |